DSMB reports

Met with Eric today and went over some tables that are generated each study period. Some time-specific sequences:

  • Data collection will stop about 4-6 weeks out from the time the DSMB meeting is to occur (to give the CTC time to collect and clean data and to get reports out to the DSMB committee)
  • Meeting is every 3 months (but they might not enroll enough patients given the 5/2015 cutoff)

Some new concepts:

  • Consort diagram – flowchart describing at how they got at the analysis population
  • TEG – thromboelastography: measurement of efficiency of blood coagulation
  • DRS (outcome) – disability rating score: alternative (secondary) measurement of outcome
  • GOSE (1* outcome) – Glasgow outcome score, extended: measure of brain functioning (1=dead, 8=OK)
  • Key SAE’s:
    • DVT – deep vein thrombosis
    • MI – myocardial infarction
    • PE – pulmonary embolism
    • seizures

Statistical issues:

  • A measurement of progression is from head CT scans. Of particular interest is the progression of blood (clots/presence/size) on the CT scan(s) but it requires surviving to the second (or later) CT. Question is if there’s confounding (in survival, in the treatment effect, or something else) that’s affecting whether or not the second CT is observed, which will change the interpretation of “CT scan blood clot progression” or the like based on how the sample was obtained.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s